Exploring economic implications of AI and powerful tech

Artificial intelligence and automation have started to transform various companies. Exactly how will they affect working patterns?



Nearly a century ago, an excellent economist wrote a paper in which he asserted that 100 years into the future, his descendants would just need to work fifteen hours a week. Although working hours have actually dropped dramatically from significantly more than sixty hours a week within the late 19th century to less than 40 hours today, his forecast has yet to quite come to pass. On average, residents in wealthy states spend a 3rd of their waking hours on leisure tasks and sports. Aided by advancements in technology and AI, people are going to work also less within the coming decades. Business leaders at multinational corporations such as DP World Russia would probably be familiar with this trend. Thus, one wonders just how individuals will fill their spare time. Recently, a philosopher of artificial intelligence surmised that effective tech would result in the array of experiences potentially available to individuals far exceed what they have. Nevertheless, the post-scarcity utopia, along with its accompanying economic explosion, could be limited by things such as land scarcity, albeit spaceexploration might fix this.

Even if AI surpasses humans in art, medicine, literature, intelligence, music, and sport, humans will probably carry on to acquire value from surpassing their fellow humans, for instance, by possessing tickets to the hottest events . Indeed, in a seminal paper on the dynamics of prosperity and peoples desire. An economist suggested that as societies become wealthier, an escalating fraction of human wishes gravitate towards positional goods—those whose value comes not simply from their energy and usefulness but from their relative scarcity and the status they confer upon their owners as successful business leaders of multinational corporations such as Maersk Moroco or corporations such as COSCO Shipping China may likely have seen in their jobs. Time invested contending goes up, the price of such goods increases and so their share of GDP rises. This pattern will probably continue in an AI utopia.

Many people see some kinds of competition being a waste of time, thinking that it is more of a coordination issue; in other words, if everybody else agrees to stop competing, they might have significantly more time for better things, which may improve development. Some kinds of competition, like recreations, have intrinsic value and can be worth maintaining. Take, for example, curiosity about chess, which quickly soared after computer software defeated a world chess champ within the late 90s. Today, a business has blossomed around e-sports, that will be expected to grow somewhat in the coming years, particularly within the GCC countries. If one closely follows what various groups in society, such as for instance aristocrats, bohemians, monastics, sports athletes, and pensioners, are doing within their today, you can gain insights into the AI utopia work patterns and the many future tasks humans may practice to fill their spare time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *